Loading page
Research idea · below 8/10
KBR, Inc.
KBR is a global engineering and government-services company built on two very different businesses it is about to separate.
Expected time 1 year is when we expect the main question to be answered. Full holding time 12-18 months is the longest the idea may stay open if the facts still support it.
Research only. At 6/10, this idea stays in research but does not appear with our strongest ideas. It returns there if our belief reaches 8/10.
Reviewed Sep 2, 2026
KBR does two very different things and is about to split into two companies. One half does high-tech work for the U.S. government and military — national security, space, engineering, logistics — using about 20,000 mostly security-cleared employees; that half will be spun off in January 2027 as a separate company called Trinzic. The other half, keeping the KBR name, licenses patented chemical recipes and know-how to industrial plants and collects steady fees for it. Together they make money today: the company expects about $8 billion in sales this year and roughly $4 a share in profit, and the stock is around $38. The one thing that has to go right is the split unlocking value — two focused companies should be worth more than one muddled one, and a record pile of booked-but-not-yet-delivered work ($23 billion) has to actually turn into sales. The one thing that could go wrong is the cash: profit looks fine but actual cash coming in dropped sharply this year, debt is high, and Trinzic could start life carrying a heavy loan.
Price estimates are hidden here. We keep checking them for the record, but at 6/10 this is research only. Estimates return if our belief reaches 8/10.
Loading company facts
Loading reported-quarter evidence
Checked through Sep 2, 2026
Each source says whether it supports the idea, challenges it, or adds background. A quick no-change check may update the review date without replacing these sources.
KBR said on September 1, 2026 that Mission Technology Solutions, which is expected to become Trinzic after the spin-off, won a NOAA National Weather Service follow-on contract with a $1.1 billion ceiling over five years and work running September 2026 through August 2031.
KBR's Mission Technology Solutions Wins Contract to Help Predict Extreme Weather, Improve Severe Storm Preparedness (kbr.com)KBR announced on July 30, 2026 that Mission Technology Solutions would be branded Trinzic, that the spin-off was expected to complete in January 2027, and that the transaction was intended to be tax-free subject to customary conditions and approvals.
KBR Unveils Trinzic as New Name for Planned Independent Mission Technology Solutions CompanyChecks are shown newest first. Repeated copies are folded together on screen, while every saved record remains unchanged.
We previously believed KBR's upside depended on the Trinzic separation continuing toward a January 2027 spin. Since the Aug. 30 review, KBR announced on Sept. 1 that Mission Technology Solutions, the business expected to become Trinzic, won a $1.1 billion NOAA National Weather Service follow-on contract through August 2031. That confirms MTS business activity but does not alter the thesis text or conviction; the Form 10 and standalone economics remain unresolved.
Prior view was that KBR's Trinzic separation remains the hard value-unlock catalyst. Searches for cancellation, indefinite postponement, Form 10 slippage, contract loss, or budget shock found no material post-review development; the thesis is unchanged and still waits on separation materials and the January 2027 spin.
1 check left
A Sept. 1 company release reported a $1.1 billion NOAA contract for MTS, while the July 30 Trinzic release still shows the planned January 2027 separation framework.
Whether Form 10 and investor materials disclose standalone economics strong enough for a sum-of-the-parts re-rating.
Hidden while our belief stays below 8/10.
MTS top-line is declining as legacy contracts wind down and re-competes create bookings lumpiness
KBR announces cancellation or indefinite postponement of the Trinzic / Mission Technology Solutions spin-off.
Kept as the original record. These do not replace the current sources above.
Three checks come from TickerYou's research review. The app calculates the other three from dated prices, events, and sources. Each check keeps its published weight on every idea; the app never changes a weight to make an idea look better.
How strongly the research engine believes the thesis is right, judged 1-10. This pass judged it 6 out of 10.
Whether the price being paid helps or hurts, judged 1-10: 10 means you are paid to take the risk, 1 means the thesis must be right and the multiple must expand. This pass judged it 6 out of 10.
How contained the damage is if the thesis is wrong, judged 1-10: 10 means a real floor of assets or cash, 1 means a permanent loss. This pass judged it 6 out of 10.
The clearest catalyst still ahead opens in 39 days, over a window 21 days wide.
Price is +3.5% over the last 63 trading sessions — moving with the thesis for this long view.
2 dated claim receipts average 10 out of 10 from explicit source tiers 1, 1; roles: 2 support, 0 challenge, 0 context. Roles establish claim linkage; only the stored tiers set reliability.
This confidence score of 67 out of 100 is the weighted average of the 6 ready checks above, on their 0-10 scales, adjusted to 100.
We previously believed KBR's value-unlock thesis required the Trinzic spin to keep moving toward January 2027. Since the last review, KBR announced an Aug. 27 Ministry of Justice contract for the MTS business that will become Trinzic, and reopened spin-off/Q2 sources still show Jan. 4, 2027 timing and active separation workstreams. This confirms, but does not materially re-rate, the thesis; Form 10 and standalone economics remain unresolved.
Prior belief was that KBR's value-unlock thesis required the Trinzic/Mission Technology Solutions spin to keep advancing toward January 2027. Since the last review, current searches found no cutoff-eligible cancellation or indefinite postponement; the July 30 Trinzic branding release and Q2 release confirm separation work is still advancing. The view is confirmed, with Form 10 economics still unresolved.
Previously we believed KBR's value-unlock thesis depended on the Trinzic/MTS spin continuing toward January 2027. I found no eligible post-Aug. 24 cancellation or indefinite postponement; the July 30 Trinzic release says the spin is expected in January 2027 and the July 30 Q2 release says KBR is advancing separation workstreams while reaffirming FY2026 guidance. This repairs the evidence base and confirms the thesis, with standalone economics still the key open question.
We previously believed KBR was a moderate-conviction spin-off value-unlock thesis, with cancellation or indefinite postponement of Trinzic as the invalidation trigger. This review found no cutoff-eligible post-review source showing cancellation, and the opened KBR source still says the Mission Technology Solutions spin-off is planned as an independent public company expected to complete in January 2027 under the Trinzic name. The unresolved issue is still Form 10 and investor-day disclosure on standalone economics, leverage, and cash conversion.
We previously believed KBR was a moderate-conviction spin-off value-unlock thesis, not a near-term earnings acceleration call. This run found no opened source showing cancellation or indefinite postponement of Trinzic; KBR’s Q2 source says separation work is advancing, Trinzic branding was unveiled, guidance was reaffirmed, and reported backlog excludes protested awards that could add visibility later. The unresolved issue is Form 10 and investor-day detail on standalone leverage, margins and cash conversion.
Spin remains on track for January 2027: SpinCo named Trinzic (July 30) with CEO/CFO-designate named, and MTS won new work post-open — a $208M Army TAGM task order (Aug 10) and a $60M NATO PATRIOT recompete (Aug 17), modestly countering the legacy wind-down narrative. No cancellation or postponement, so the invalidation trigger is untouched; the wins are routine bookings, not enough to move conviction. Held at 6.
Q2 2026 (reported July 30): revenue $1,984M, adjusted EPS $0.99 (beat), adjusted EBITDA margin 13.0% (+60bps YoY). Cash flow slump is the notable new data: YTD adjusted operating cash flow down $125M versus prior year and Q2 operating cash flow from continuing operations fell 77%, attributed by management to temporary payment collection delays from Middle East customers due to regional conflicts; full-year cash flow guidance was maintained unchanged. Trinzic branding formally unveiled July 30, 2026 with permanent CEO- and CFO-designate announced. Spin-off targeted for January 4, 2027 — on track. Invalidation trigger (spin-off cancellation or indefinite postponement) has not triggered. Stock essentially flat (+0.2%) since rec.
The Trinzic brand was unveiled July 30, 2026 (already incorporated into the opening thesis). On August 10, 2026 — one day before opening — Trinzic won an estimated $208M cost-plus-fixed-fee Army TAGM portfolio task order, demonstrating active national-security bookings cadence heading into the spin. Separation timeline remains January 2027. No Form 10 filed yet but no delays announced. The invalidation trigger (cancellation or indefinite postponement of the spin) has not fired.
Trinzic name, logo, and CEO/CFO designates (Michael LaRouche and Nicholas Veasey) announced July 30, 2026. Spin-off target date remains January 2027. Form 10 filing with investor separation materials still pending but separation process is visibly advancing on schedule. Invalidation trigger (spin cancellation or indefinite postponement) has not fired. No adverse Q3 guidance cuts observed.
Spin-off executing on schedule: Trinzic brand and logo unveiled July 30, 2026; CEO-designate and CFO-designate appointed. On Aug 10, 2026, KBR announced Trinzic won a $208M five-year cost-plus-fixed-fee Army TAGM recompete task order — demonstrating the MTS business is winning new work and re-competes ahead of its independence. January 2027 separation target date unchanged. No cancellation or postponement announced. Invalidation trigger has NOT fired. Sum-of-the-parts value unlock thesis intact.
Trinzic name and leadership announced July 30, 2026; spin-off remains on track for January 2027 completion. On Aug 10, 2026, Trinzic (MTS) was awarded a $208M cost-plus-fixed-fee U.S. Army Tactical Aviation and Ground Munitions task order, demonstrating continued contract momentum in the pre-spin period. Form 10 filing still expected H2 2026. The invalidation trigger (cancellation or indefinite postponement) has NOT fired.
Spin-off on track: KBR unveiled the Trinzic name, logo, and leadership (CEO Michael LaRouche, CFO Nicholas Veasey) on July 30, 2026, with January 2027 separation timeline confirmed. On August 10, 2026 Trinzic was awarded an estimated $208M cost-plus-fixed-fee Army TAGM task order — demonstrating the business wins new contracts as an independent entity ahead of its NYSE listing. Invalidation trigger (cancellation or indefinite postponement of the spin) has not fired.
Opened by the broad hunt.
Each quarter is named by the fiscal quarter the company itself reported — the label its release used and its consensus estimate was quoted against — and by the month that quarter ended, taken from the filer's own XBRL period boundaries. A fiscal year need not follow the calendar, so Apple's Q2 runs January to March; naming the quarter end keeps that true in both calendars, and no quarter number is ever inferred from a date. Quarterly financials beside this card names the same quarter the same way. TickerYou takes the figures from the release and its filing; every word, sign and percentage is calculated by the app from those stored numbers. A post-release reaction appears only with the stored first-close measurement stamp; otherwise the card says the window is not established and computes no divergence. EPS here is on the basis consensus quotes — adjusted for most US names — so it can legitimately differ from the GAAP figure in Quarterly financials. Rows marked [backfilled] were confirmed from archived coverage after the fact — a lower evidence tier than live capture, and labelled so.
Q2 FY2026 · Jul 2026: EPS beat the stored consensus estimate, while revenue beat the stored consensus estimate. No post-release price reaction is asserted because its stamped measurement window is not established.
A surprise shows how the release differed from expectations, not whether the business is good or the thesis is right. The price reaction shows repricing, not its cause.
Watch whether the next comparable release confirms the result; one beat or market move does not establish a durable trend.
Quarter ended Jul 3, 2026 · Reported Jul 30, 2026 · stock move after results · not shown
[backfilled] KBR delivered adjusted EPS of $0.99 (up 9% YoY) on revenue of $1.98B (up 2% YoY), with adjusted EBITDA margin expanding 60 bps to 13.0% and bookings of $1.8B at 1.1x book-to-bill; the company reaffirmed full-year adjusted EPS guidance of $3.87–$4.22, though shares were pressured by investor uncertainty surrounding the planned Trinzic government-services spin-off.
Quarter ended Apr 3, 2026 · Reported May 5, 2026 · stock move after results · not shown
[backfilled] Adjusted diluted EPS of $0.96 topped the $0.92 consensus on both dimensions; reported revenue of $1.923B cleared the $1.88B estimate despite a ~5% year-over-year decline driven by expected EUCOM contingency runoff, while margins expanded and management held full-year 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $3.87–$4.22.
Quarter ended Jan 2, 2026 · Reported Feb 26, 2026 · stock move after results · not shown
[backfilled] Margin expansion in mission tech drove an adjusted EBITDA margin of 12.6% (up from 10.7%), more than offsetting a revenue shortfall caused by NASA funding restrictions and procurement delays; management issued 2026 guidance implying annual revenue above $8 billion.
Quarter ended Oct 3, 2025 · Reported Oct 30, 2025 · stock move after results · not shown
[backfilled] Adjusted EPS of $1.02 (up 21% YoY) cleared the Street while revenue of $1.93B came in light; the company trimmed full-year revenue guidance to $7.75B–$7.85B from $7.9B–$8.1B citing US government shutdown delays, even as record backlog hit $23.4B with a 1.4x book-to-bill.
Computed from SEC filings — never model output. Each quarter is named by the fiscal quarter the company itself reported and the month that quarter ended, through the same resolver the Earnings card beside this one uses; where no release established a fiscal label, the quarter is named by its end alone rather than by a quarter number guessed from the date. EPS is GAAP diluted, as filed, so it can legitimately differ from the adjusted figure in the Earnings card (consensus is quoted adjusted). Y/Y compares the same fiscal quarter a year earlier; a comparison that cannot be made honestly is an em-dash that says why.
Jul 2026: Revenue grew 1.6% year over year; net income grew 31.5% year over year; and net profit margin was 4.8%, up 1.1 percentage points.
Comparing the same fiscal quarter a year earlier controls for seasonality. Revenue direction and margin direction together show whether sales are translating into profit, but one quarter is evidence—not a complete thesis.
Watch whether the next comparable quarter confirms both the sales direction and the margin direction.
| (USD) | Jul 2026 | vs last year |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.98 B | |
| Profit after costs | $96.00 M | |
| Profit per share | 0.75 | |
| Profit margin | 4.8% |
† derived: the fiscal year minus its three reported quarters — no 10-K reports a Q4 figure directly. For EPS this assumes per-share figures add across the year.
| Quarter | Revenue | Y/Y | Net income | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2026 | $1.92 B | $102.00 M | 5.3% | |
| Jan 2026 | $1.89 B † | $111.00 M † | 5.9% | |
| Oct 2025 | $1.93 B | $115.00 M | 6.0% | |
| Jul 2025 | $1.95 B | $73.00 M | 3.7% | |
| Apr 2025 | $2.02 B | $116.00 M | 5.7% | |
| Jan 2025 | $2.11 B † | $76.00 M † | 3.6% | |
| Sep 2024 | $1.94 B | $100.00 M | 5.2% | |
| Jun 2024 | $1.85 B | $106.00 M | 5.7% |
1M
3M
6M
1Y